Smita Datta

Associate Professor, EIILM - Kolkata

Email: smitadatta16@gmail.com

Supriya Paul

Assistant Professor and Chief Administrative Officer, EIILM - Kolkata

Email: supriya.paul@eiilm.co.in

Mitali Sengupta*

Associate Professor, EIILM - Kolkata

Email: drmitalisengupta.eiilm@gmail.com

*Corresponding Author

JEL Classification: O3                                                                                                                                                         https://doi.org/10.65176/IJLM.V2I1.15

Abstract 

The sudden dominance of machines and artificial intelligence has led to a profound debate regarding the future of humanity, with specific reference to human value. It often considers productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness to be at the centre stage and overlooks dignity and ethics in the process. This research article conceptually attempts to reframe the ongoing discourse on technology and technological innovation, which is considered to be of paramount importance. It logically builds an argument on the prioritisation of human values over the paradigms of machine-centric anthropological activities, in the backdrop of the philosophical depth provided by the Asian fundamental value system, coupled with the solid foundation of wisdom from the Bhagavad Gita. This study, while positioning itself within the broader framework of Asianism, puts forward the concept of “New Humanity”, which is anchored to the ideals of fraternity, equality, and freedom.

The review of literature from scholarly articles, policy documents, and texts put forward by classical philosophers, this article develops a theoretical model where Asian traditions provide a counterbalance to the mechanistic worldly viewpoints. The human-centred society is laid down on the strong ethical foundations given by the teachings of Srimad Bhagavad Gita, where “Samatvam Yoga Uchyate” or equanimity as equality and balance through yoga, “Atmaupamyena sarvatra” or igniting the path of equality, universal empathy as fraternity as well as “Svadharma” or self-realised duty as freedom. These values have often been found to be contrasted with Westernised rationality emphasising technology, which follows the discourse of reducing human beings into economic units or mere algorithmic functions with predictive outcomes.

Various findings on Asian humanism have successfully provided a sustainable pathway filled with compassion, balance, moral responsibility, and discourse on technology. This new model is based on the foundation that machines serve as important instruments of service, whereas humans remain ethical decision makers and co-creators of a progressive society that balances technology and human values. The current framework not only challenges the post-humanism notion but also positions Asian values as the moral compass of civilisation.

This paper concludes with the philosophy that the novel design of humanity is propelled not only by technological supremacy, where tools and machines forward the final verdict, but also by value supremacy that returns to the basic foundations of human values to uphold dignity, freedom, equity, and unity. Such reorientation through Asian values of human psychology shall lay strong foundations in the future emerging digital era, where technology is to be demarcated as a service provider and not the ultimate master of human value.

Keywords: Asianism, Technology, Human Values, Bhagavat Gita, Equality, Fraternity, Freedom

References

Batool, A., D. Zowghi, and M. Bano. Responsible AI Governance: A Systematic Literature Review. arXiv, 2023. arxiv.org/abs/2401.10896.

Bauernhans, T., B. Vogel-Heuser, and M. ten Hompel. Allgemeine Grundlagen. Edited by M. ten Hompel, vol. 4, Handbuch Industrie 4.0, Springer, 2017.

Bodhi, Bhikkhu. Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma: The Abhidhammattha Sangaha. Pariyatti Publishing, 2012.

Breque, Maija, Lars De Nul, and Athanasios Petridis. Industry 5.0: Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission, Luxembourg, 2021.

Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Society 5.0 — A Human-Centered Society. 2016, www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/society5_0/index.html.

Das, Sandhya Rani. “Pandit Nilakantha’s View on Svadharma.” Journal of Advance and Future Research, vol. 3, no. 6, 2025, pp. 320 -323 https://rjwave.org/jaafr/papers/JAAFR2506038.pdf.

Dasgupta, Surendranath. A History of Indian Philosophy. Vol. 2, Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 1975.

Desbordes, Gaëlle, et al. “Moving Beyond Mindfulness: Defining Equanimity as an Outcome Measure in Meditation and Contemplative Research.” Mindfulness, vol. 6, no. 2, 2015, pp. 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0269-8.

Fu, Panpan, et al. “Reexamining the Relationship between ESG and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Role of Buddhism.” Borsa Istanbul Review, vol. 24, no. 1, 2024, pp. 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2023.10.011.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Philosophical Hermeneutics. University of California Press, 2008.

Hagendorff, Thilo. “The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines.” Minds and Machines, vol. 30, no. 1, 2020, pp. 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8.

Havens, Timothy. “Confucianism as Humanism.” CLA Journal, vol. 1, 2013, pp. 33–41.

Hofstede, Geert. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Vol. 5, Sage, 1984.

Hoffmann, Stanley. “Clash of Globalizations.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 81, 2002, p. 104.

Jijina, Parisha, Varda Vasa, and Urmi Nanda Biswas. “Construct Description of Samatva from the Bhagavad Gita: Implications for Holistic Well-Being.” PURUSHARTHA: A Journal of Management, Ethics and Spirituality, vol. 13, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1–20.

Kar, Arun Kumar. “The Concept of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (The World Is a Family): Insights from the Mahopanisad.” National Journal of Hindi & Sanskrit Research, vol. 1, no. 49, 2023, pp. 42–45.

Kiel, Daniel, et al. “Sustainable Industrial Value Creation: Benefits and Challenges of Industry 4.0.” International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 21, no. 8, 2017, p. 1740015. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617400151.

Li, B., et al. “Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices.” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 9, 2023, Article 177. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555803.

Maier, J. Made Smarter Review. Department for Business EIS, The Stationery Office, London, 2017.

National Archives of Singapore. White Paper on Shared Values. Presented to Parliament, 1991. www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/government_records/record-details/a472b486-7aea-11e7-83df-0050568939ad.

OECD. OECD Council Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence. OECD, 2019. legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449.

Ogihara, Yuji, et al. “Are Common Names Becoming Less Common? The Rise in Uniqueness and Individualism in Japan.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, 2015, p. 158691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01490.

Peukert, Bernd, et al. “Addressing Sustainability and Flexibility in Manufacturing via Smart Modular Machine Tool Frames to Support Sustainable Value Creation.” Procedia CIRP, vol. 29, 2015, pp. 514–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.181.

Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC), Singapore. Model AI Governance Framework. 2nd ed., 2020. www.pdpc.gov.sg/help-and-resources/2020/01/model-ai-governance-framework.

Raina, Sunil K., and Raman Kumar. “‘Vasudaiva Kutumbakam-One Earth, One Family, One Future:’ India’s Mantra for a Healthy and Prosperous Earth as the G20 Leader.” Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, vol. 12, no. 2, 2023, pp. 191–193. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_254_23.

Rastogi, Kritika. “Exploring Swadharma: An Overview.” The International Journal of Indian Psychology, vol. 6, no. 3, 2018, pp. 26–29. https://doi.org/10.25215/0603.023.

Rüßmann, Michael, et al. “Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industries.” Boston Consulting Group, vol. 9, no. 1, 2015, pp. 54–89.

Santos, Henri C., Michael E. W. Varnum, and Igor Grossmann. “Global Increases in Individualism.” Psychological Science, vol. 28, no. 9, 2017, pp. 1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617700622.

Sen, Amartya. “Human Rights and Asian Values.” The New Republic, 1997. media-1.carnegiecouncil.org/cceia/254_sen.pdf.

Shelley, Bhaskara P. “Sustainable Humanity beyond the COVID-19 Crisis: ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’ for ‘One Planet, One Health, One Future.’” Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, 2021, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4103/amhs.amhs_118_21.

Shun, K. L. “Ideas of the Good in Chinese Philosophy.” A Companion to World Philosophies, edited by E. Deutsch and R. Bontekoe, Blackwell Publishers, 1997.

Sony, Michael, and Subhash Naik. “Key Ingredients for Evaluating Industry 4.0 Readiness for Organizations: A Literature Review.” Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 27, no. 7, 2020, pp. 2213–2232. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2018-0284.

Sony, Michael, et al. “An Empirical Examination of Benefits, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors of Industry 4.0 in Manufacturing and Service Sector.” Technology in Society, vol. 67, 2021, p. 101754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101754.

Srinivasan, M. S. “Shaping Values in Business: A Dharmic Vision.” Gitam Journal of Management, vol. 7, no. 4, 2009.

Swearer, Donald K. “Buddhist Virtue, Voluntary Poverty, and Extensive Benevolence.” The Journal of Religious Ethics, vol. 26, no. 1, 1998, pp. 71–103.

Syamala, K. “Bhagavad Gita’s Vision for a Harmonious Society: Ethics, Values and Social Justice.” MEΘEXIS Journal of Research in Values and Spirituality, vol. 1, 2025, pp. 94–103.

Theodor, Ithamar. “Extracting a Humanistic Philosophy of Social and Environmental Well-Being from the Bhagavad-Gītā.” Journal of Dharma Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, pp. 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42240-023-00138-9.

Triandis, Harry C. “The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts.” Psychological Review, vol. 96, no. 3, 1989, pp. 506–520.

Tucker, M. E. “Introduction.” Confucian Spirituality, edited by Tu Weiming and M. E. Tucker, vol. 1, The Crossroad Publishing Company, 2003.

UNESCO. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO, 2021. www.unesco.org/en/articles/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence.

Wang, Feng-Yan, Zhen-Dong Wang, and Rou-Jia Wang. "The Taiji model of self." Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2019, 1443.

Wang, Zhen-Dong, and Feng-Yan Wang. "The Taiji model of self II: developing self models and self-cultivation theories based on the Chinese cultural traditions of Taoism and Buddhism." Frontiers in psychology, Vol. 11, 2020, 540074.

Xu, Xun, et al. “Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, Conception and Perception.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 61, 2021, pp. 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006.

Zhu, Qin. “Ethics, Society, and Technology: A Confucian Role-Ethics Perspective.” Technology in Society, vol. 63, 2020, Article 101424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101424.