Nguyen Duy Quang
Head of Digital Economics, Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics and Finance
Email: quangnd@uef.edu.vn
JEL Classification: D63, Z1 https://doi.org/10.65176/IJLM.V2I1.10
Abstract
As universities become increasingly multicultural, cultural integration must promote social cohesion for students’ success and well-being. This study investigates the impact of five dimensions of cultural integration (intercultural awareness, intercultural contact, positive attitudes toward diversity, perception of openness, and engagement in cultural activities) on social cohesion experienced by students at the Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics and Finance (UEF). Grounded in Deardorff’s Intercultural Competence Framework (2006) and Earley and Ang’s Cultural Intelligence Theory (2003), this research model links the cognitive, affective, and behavioural aspects of intercultural interaction to students’ sense of belonging, collaboration, and solidarity. Employing a quantitative survey of 354 UEF undergraduates, this study tested a multiple regression model to predict social cohesion. The predictors collectively explained 76.3% of the variance (Adjusted R² = .759, p < .001). Intercultural contact emerged as the most important factor (β = .665), followed by positive attitude (β = .520), cultural engagement (β = .313), intercultural awareness (β = .198), and openness perception (β = .179). These results show the importance of direct intercultural experiences and positive attitudes in building a strong learning community. These findings suggest that university administrators should establish structured intercultural workshops and peer mentoring programs to foster significant cross-cultural interactions. Such initiatives promise to strengthen social solidarity and academic collaboration in diverse settings.
Keywords: Cultural integration; Higher education; Social cohesion; UEF
References
Arasaratnam, L. A. (2009). The development of a new instrument of intercultural communication competence. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 9(2), 1–08.
Borkowska, M., & Laurence, J. (2021). Coming together or coming apart? Changes in social cohesion during the Covid-19 pandemic in England. European Societies, 23(S1), S618–S636.
Braskamp, L. A., Braskamp, D. C., & Engberg, M. E. (2014). Global Perspective Inventory (GPI): Its purpose, construction, potential uses, and psychometric characteristics. Glob. Perspect. Inst, 1–35.
Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
Deardorff, D. K., & Jones, E. (2023). Intercultural competence as a core focus in international higher education. In The handbook of international higher education (pp. 223–241). Routledge.
Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2016). Happier together. Social cohesion and subjective well‐being in Europe. International Journal of Psychology, 51(3), 163–176.
Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Stanford University Press.
Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421–443.
Safdar, S., Lay, C., & Struthers, W. (2003). The Process of Acculturation and Basic Goals: Testing a Multidimensional Individual Difference Acculturation Model with Iranian Immigrants in Canada. Applied Psychology, 52(4), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00151
Schiefer, D., & Van Der Noll, J. (2017). The Essentials of Social Cohesion: A Literature Review. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1314-5
Veerman, G.-J., & Denessen, E. (2021). Social cohesion in schools: A non-systematic review of its conceptualisation and instruments. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1940633. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1940633